Well it looks like you can perhaps add all three of our starting receivers to the injury list as well for this week, though Wallace claims he'll play. Will be interesting to see if the young guns outplay them if they are out though.
I am not blaming the defense for this loss in any way shape or form. If I had to give them a grade on their overall performance, it would be a solid A. The fact remains though, for whatever reason you wish to assign, they play great games and so often give up the big play when it matters most.
The offense is ..not sure there is even a word for how bad they are right now. For a while Joe was a huge part of the problem, but this week I can't pin it on him. Our receivers literally can't catch a ball that hits their hands. When your starters are that bad, sorry but that falls on the FO.
Giving your high picks to the defense in such a lopsided manner is most definitely short changing and ignoring the offense. If we had not ignored it, perhaps ( who knows because I honestly don't believe we have anyone that recognizes true offensive talent) we'd have some at least above average guys who can catch passes and have chemistry because they've been here for more than a season.
If we'd addressed the O line, perhaps our starting talent would have been our 2nd string and our 2nd string would be our 3rd string, etc. At least maybe we'd have a serviceable O line. Hard to say.
I don't know about absolving all blame for all these injuries either. How many years now have we been at the top for injured players? I mean, is it an issue with our conditioning coaches? No way for us to really know that one way or the other.
If Wallace and Maclin are out, I have no hope. If Perriman is out... Joe might have a few more completions.
In this game, they shouldn't even have been in a position to have this happen and that's why I can't really even talk about a collapse. They were down for the entire game until the very end and they had one lapse and I can't hold that against them. As for the past, I don't know what it is. I examined several games where the play calling was fine and players just didn't execute or they played so tentative and scared. Is that Pees not utilizing the strengths of the players? I don't think that's quite it because they use these same coverages the entire game with fine results. Are they scared because of a history of collapses? I don't know. I can't tell you. But I am in total agreement that it is very frustrating. I wouldn't have expected that to happen based on the course of the entire game, but I can't really blame anyone but Weddle because he went for the strip, not the tackle. Total lack of judgement there.
With regards to the offense, there are several players I really wanted in drafts that went just before the Ravens drafted. OBJ, Hopkins, Eifert. There are guys I wanted that the Ravens flat out passed on in Jeffrey or Allen. How is that so many fans can see that Jeffrey or Allen are potential premiere talents but the Ravens pass on them for a guy like Arthur Brown or Courtney Upshaw? I don't know. It's really infuriating. And for what it's worth, in 2013, I wanted a trade up badly for Hopkins. Of course, it takes two to tango, but every one and their mother knew Hopkins was going at 26. Just trade up those seven spots. Give up a fourth rounder if you need to. Give up a seventh with it. He looked like a guy Joe could work with and someone who would fit like a glove with Joe. I can't explain it because as someone who is so untrained with regards to scouting sees this and goes, "Yeah, this guy has IT, but the FO says, yeah, we'll pass on Jeffrey and Allen." Oh, and the one that KILLS me now is not taking Michael Thomas over Kamelai Correa. They traded back and STILL could have had Thomas. Dude, come on, Eric.
I think Wallace, Watson, and Maclin have been pretty steady when given the chances. I just think that they need to do two things. One is on Marty and one is on Joe. For Marty, Maclin is a player that absolutely thrives in space. Manufacture some drag routes, some bubble screens, or some quick outs that get him the ball in space and allow him to work. The Ravens are checking it down enough; let him try to make a play. Also, use the damn play action more. Joe has operated so well for his entire career out of play action on bootlegs and the Ravens are averaging a really healthy 4.5 YPC. Why are you not running PA? For Joe, he's gotta take the deep shots. Wallace still has speed and Perriman can run by almost anyone. Even if it doesn't net a completion, that defensive back can no longer squat on the short routes and the safeties can't creep up. They have to respect the possibility of the deep ball. Make them think twice.
I can't really blame the FO for the offensive line. No way you expect Yanda, Lewis, Skura, and Siragusa getting injured and no way you predict Urschel retiring. As far as Urschel goes, I think it's really shitty that he didn't make his decision sooner because I'm sure the FO would have altered their draft plans had Urschel made the decision in March rather than after free agency and the draft. A little salty over the timing on that.
As far as the injuries go, in the past, when you lose a Jimmy, Suggs, Maclin, etc., it was a death sentence because the FO never built up the proper depth. It was always crazy to me because the FO would be like, "We can never have enough pass rushers, we can never have enough wide receivers, we can never have enough corners, etc." So, what do they do? Oh, right, draft defensive lineman, inside linebackers, running backs. Positions they find easily in later rounds or develop incredibly well. "Well the board didn't fall our way." I don't care if a guy is rated 50 when you have pick 45. Pick the damn corner, pass rusher, receiver. You know damn well if one of them gets injured that you're screwed. You're pretty damn set at defensive line to the point that you make your rookies perpetual inactives on game day.