• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

2018 Free Agency

it has nothing to do with Doom being old. Nothing at all

U need to go back and read them. I don’t wantem he pointed out some stats say he is the best rusher in the nfl on a per snap basis. And I’m not buying into that. Stats don’t tell it all. Like if a wr is double covered. The cornerbacks get good stat performance numbers that doesn’t put in a side note he got help.
 
If Dumervil is still so awesome y doesn’t anybody really want’em?? What’s he making?? Let’s see his offers should he get dumped again. Ravens have serious need at edge rusher and dumped him like a chic that gained 30lbs. And I saw the point of your rants. My biased toward older players clearly irritates u. BTW I never said Lafell a no.1 I said no.2 caliber. And he beat Humph so bad or he woulda that Humph tackled’em outa desperation
Which is inferring Dumveril's performance as a player based on league interest, or market value. The density here is almost entertaining. By that logic, Casey Heyward must be sub-par as well given that he managed a meager $5 million per season despite being in his prime and having years of terrific tape. I have no issues with being against signing aging players who are liable to decline. I'm focusing on the faulty logic used. You made a callback to a previously made point from 2015, and I pointed out its inaccuracy. That's the entire basis of my point. The fact that this continues to go over your head is beyond me. Yes, you did. When you and I argued about LaFell in contrast to Brandon Lloyd. Your general bias is the point of contention. You've made multiple points thus far that were nowhere near accurate, much like the Arizona example.
 
U need to go back and read them. I don’t wantem he pointed out some stats say he is the best rusher in the nfl on a per snap basis. And I’m not buying into that. Stats don’t tell it all. Like if a wr is double covered. The cornerbacks get good stat performance numbers that doesn’t put in a side note he got help.
How are you requesting for somewhat to re-read the material you didn't bother to fully read the first time? The exact adjectives used were effective and generally productive? How does this equate to "so awesome" and whichever other hyperboles have been provided? My exact quote was:

"Does that place him as the best in that facet? Absolutely not. Nowhere near first from an ability standpoint."

Read. Absorb and comprehend. Don't skim and presume. This isn't one of your tape studies.
 
How are you requesting for somewhat to re-read the material you didn't bother to fully read the first time? The exact adjectives used were effective and generally productive? How does this equate to "so awesome" and whichever other hyperboles have been provided? My exact quote was:

"Does that place him as the best in that facet? Absolutely not. Nowhere near first from an ability standpoint."

Read. Absorb and comprehend. Don't skim and presume. This isn't one of your tape studies.

Y was your original post then Suggs and Dumervil were 1 and 5 in productivity. If u don’t believe there’s significance to that. Y even post it?? BTW I stand by my opinions of Rashard Robinson. If he keeps his senses intact. And Humph if he isn’t protected he will be exposed.
 
Y was your original post then Suggs and Dumervil were 1 and 5 in productivity. If u don’t believe there’s significance to that. Y even post it??
You do understand that there's an in-between of disregarding a number and taking it entirely at face value, right? You know, the path that I took? It was used to support the notion that they were both effective as pass rushers this season, a term that is among the least praiseworthy or hyperbolic complements that can be given. And that went directly against your sentiment from years ago, hence my contention. The aforementioned path is more sensible than presuming erroneous theories about scheme-related advantages while seeing none of the tape from this past season, or providing a misguided comprehension of when pass rushing specialists are utilized. That's what I took issue with. You begun debating with defective logic, and I raised issues with the logic used. Your presumptions about my supposed intentions otherwise are self-invented.
 
You do understand that there's an in-between of disregarding a number and taking it entirely at face value, right? You know, the path that I took? It was used to support the notion that they were both effective as pass rushers this season, a term that is among the least praiseworthy or hyperbolic complements that can be given. And that went directly against your sentiment from years ago, hence my contention. The aforementioned path is more sensible than presuming erroneous theories about scheme-related advantages while seeing none of the tape from this past season, or providing a misguided comprehension of when pass rushing specialists are utilized. That's what I took issue with. You begun debating with defective logic, and I raised issues with the logic used. Your presumptions about my supposed intentions otherwise are self-invented.
Dude whatever I fell like I have ADD reading all your stuff. I’m not gonna go back and read and post what u said. I don’t care. You wanna sign washed up cap cuts based on previous numbers have fun. Root away for them. I’m trying to give attention to 40 times now
 
Dude whatever I fell like I have ADD reading all your stuff. I’m not gonna go back and read and post what u said. I don’t care. You wanna sign washed up cap cuts based on previous numbers have fun. Root away for them. I’m trying to give attention to 40 times now
Never said or implied the latter once. Even stated that Dumervil is likelier to decline significantly. That is again a byproduct of your own fallacious presumptions that could've been prevented to actually attempting to comprehend the comments. You can't be bothered to read seven sentences, but you have the ability to respond to each reply. Job well done.
 
Never said or implied the latter once. Even stated that Dumervil is likelier to decline significantly. That is again a byproduct of your own fallacious presumptions that could've been prevented to actually attempting to comprehend the comments. You can't be bothered to read seven sentences, but you have the ability to respond to each one. Job well done.
No, cuz I said to you what’s the significance if u can’t count on him to repeat?? If he isn’t somebody that can make an impact on the ravens next year I don’t care what he did. Unless I’m a fan of a particular players style.
 
Oh good. Speculation that we are interested in prepetual underachiever Tavon Austin. If Sean McVay couldn't find a use for you then why?

Not that I think Sean McVay isn't smart offensively but The Rams envision using Tavon Austin similar to that of Desean Jackson according to what i read off of rotoworld.com .He obviously failed in that role which seem to have motivated The Rams to trade for Sammy Watkins. Austin is fast but ideally asking him to be Desean Jackson isn't the right direction to go. He's a guy that better served in the slot and in plays that can take advantage of his yards after the catch ability .
 
Not that I think Sean McVay isn't smart offensively but The Rams envision using Tavon Austin similar to that of Desean Jackson according to what i read off of rotoworld.com .He obviously failed in that role which seem to have motivated The Rams to trade for Sammy Watkins. Austin is fast but ideally asking him to be Desean Jackson isn't the right direction to go. He's a guy that better served in the slot and in plays that can take advantage of his yards after the catch ability .
Yes agree, Austin and Jackson are totally different types of players. Austin I’m the slot would be a better situation to be in.
 
No, cuz I said to you what’s the significance if u can’t count on him to repeat?? If he isn’t somebody that can make an impact on the ravens next year I don’t care what he did. Unless I’m a fan of a particular players style.
As I've said multiple times before, the significance was that the point from 2015 paraded around as an accurate portrayal perhaps wasn't as precise. That was literally it. It was arguably inaccurate and was pointed out as such. The issues that I took thereafter was that you continued to debate with presumed points that were either inapplicable or entirely off the mark, points that I either could dispel from my past tape studies or can debunk with current ones. The 49ers scheme from this past season. The Arizona example. Why use them as defense points when the homework either admittedly wasn't done or was seemingly done questionably? Why open yourself up to potentially spreading misinformation to anyone who puts stock into your comments, and being liable to look worse off if it's they're disproved afterwards? It's a strange approach. Also, twice now you've mentioned that your unwillingness to read my replies before directly addressing the content. Let's stick to one or the other.
 
So, Barkley to Colts at #3

ive assumed that from the beginning
at worst he's going 4th
he could go 2nd, 3rd or 4th but there's no way he goes lower and i think the fit with the colts works best (but who knows... maybe the giants really are stupid enough to ride with eli and only eli again)
 
I want the entire FO drug tested, make the results public, and test them again if this comes into fruition.

pretty sure it was just nfl media hyping up anything they could and just attaching any free agent to every club - ravens werent specifically mentioned in the article but were tagged in the alert
 
ive assumed that from the beginning
at worst he's going 4th
he could go 2nd, 3rd or 4th but there's no way he goes lower and i think the fit with the colts works best (but who knows... maybe the giants really are stupid enough to ride with eli and only eli again)
I agree, would be a mistake for the Giants to go with Eli again. Davis Webb is not their savior And they won’t have the chance to pick 2nd again for a long time unless they hire mcadoo back.
 
Top