QuothTheRaven
Veteran
We'll have to wait until January to see thatImagine what the team would look like if Lamar and the offense was humming at the same time that our pass rush was getting home??
We'll have to wait until January to see thatImagine what the team would look like if Lamar and the offense was humming at the same time that our pass rush was getting home??
I love the ownership he takes, especially with how young he is
this has been true for most seasons, but this season he has fallen off a cliff. He did have a good game yesterday, but so did our entire defense yesterday. Madubuike, Queen, Bowser, Houston all had good to very good games.Many here regularly beat up on BWill, but it’s no accident that the run D is 1000% better with a healthy Brandon in the game.
Looked like it, and of course he seemed to be in Baker’s face all night. Stop getting cute with him and let him do his thingOweh was on the edge for mostly all his snaps correct?
it certainly seemed that way. He was in the backfield all night.Oweh was on the edge for mostly all his snaps correct?
Many here regularly beat up on BWill, but it’s no accident that the run D is 1000% better with a healthy Brandon in the game.
It’s called winning UGLY !For me, its pretty simple. Our offense will be limited the rest of the year because we're not really that effective running the ball. In a vacuum, our rushing stats look favorable league wide. But that's almost entirely Lamar, and a lot of the bigger gains are on unscripted plays.
Lamar has more than double the rushing yardage of ANY RB on this team. The two RBs we actually play and give carries to (Murray and Freeman) average 32 yards/game each and combine to average 3.8 YPC, which is well below replacement level in the NFL.
In 5 of our 11 games this year, RBs have failed to eclipse 75 rushing yards TOTAL, for the whole group, in a game. They've only gone over 100 yards 3 times in total, and not surprisingly, we won all three games (KC, LAC, MIN). They've been held under 40 yards rushing three times.
This offense isn't going to dramatically improve I don't think. I'm not sure what else they can do to improve it. There's no extra resources coming, and there's more coaching I see that is going to improve it. It is what it is.
this has been true for most seasons, but this season he has fallen off a cliff. He did have a good game yesterday, but so did our entire defense yesterday. Madubuike, Queen, Bowser, Houston all had good to very good games.
Id argue this was his best game in the last couple of years. We’re certainly better against the run with him in there but last nights performance hasn’t been the norm recently. Hope he can keep it up though because that was shades of prime BWill.
Well, me personally, I have zero percent interest in seeing more designed runs for Lamar. Love the guy, and he's not your prototype QB by any stretch, but there's a reason why QBs don't get hit 15-20 times a game like he does. They're not built like RBs and they aren't designed to take those hits. We've been playing with fire all year in this regard.What you're saying is not wrong. I also tried to state that you can't have play action without fear of the running game. However, see @rossihunter2 reply to me above. We had far more success throwing on first down than running it.
We all know that the RBs are limited. But we are still looking for ways to improve. My very naive fan thought is to try and use the passing game to set up the run. Because right now as you said most teams know on first down, more likely than not we're running it. They're not afraid of either one up the gut and they really aren't afraid of either bouncing outside. So they know if they just play disciplined against Lamar we're talking about a 1 yard gain at most.
I think as uncomfortable as it may be and especially so for Roman, this has gotta be a pass first team. We just don't have the resources to justify trying to be a run first team.
The only way would be if we went back to having Lamar carry it 4 times a drive. If there was a greater threat to Lamar running each running play, it might help out the running backs. But we all know the consequences of doing that.
But that's what I see. Start passing more or start running Lamar more.
Well, me personally, I have zero percent interest in seeing more designed runs for Lamar. Love the guy, and he's not your prototype QB by any stretch, but there's a reason why QBs don't get hit 15-20 times a game like he does. They're not built like RBs and they aren't designed to take those hits. We've been playing with fire all year in this regard.
I fully agree we're a pass-first offense this year. My points were, in some ways, pointing out the hypocrisy of the fanbase, which is to stay that if Lamar drops back 45-50 times to throw, and we lose, the 10000% first criticism is a lack of emphasis in the run game and bad play calling because of it.
Because the reality is that's kind of guaranteed to happen when you throw more on first down. Even assuming like a normal 60-65% completion rate, that means at least 1/3 of the time, you're staring at 2nd and long, which means you turn into a throw the ball on 3 downs kind of team. And that will ebb and flow with game flow and situations.
I don't know that the answer is to simply run the ball less. I'm not convinced that will yield more points scored.
Baker is injured and we have the best run defense in nfl. Shit im banking on them going after wrs and even maybe a qb this offseasonRegarding Roman, I have one point to make. Consider ifStefanski had been calling our plays. He got 40 yds out of what many claim is the best OL and RBs in the league. Think of that when you ask for a new OC, because that would be a likely outcome in terms of talent.
Entirely true just following along with the theme of the conversation lolTbf it has nothing to do with how his dad raised him… thats all on tyreke hill
How many QBs have they drafted in the past 10 years? a bunch I knowBaker is injured and we have the best run defense in nfl. Shit im banking on them going after wrs and even maybe a qb this offseason