BloodRaven
MVP
At the end of the day it's weak af to me, theres nothing exciting or interesting about four All Stars cruising through a season unchallenged, wheres the sense of achievement? Anyways I'm glad this season is over.
I think this was the most predictable season of sports I have ever seen.At the end of the day it's weak af to me, theres nothing exciting or interesting about four All Stars cruising through a season unchallenged, wheres the sense of achievement? Anyways I'm glad this season is over.
Yeah, I've never been able to wrap my head around the idea that KD was wrong for going where he felt he could win a championship. Why is that a bad thing? When you can go wherever you want isn't that the best and only choice?
At the end of the day it's weak af to me, theres nothing exciting or interesting about four All Stars cruising through a season unchallenged, wheres the sense of achievement? Anyways I'm glad this season is over.
More like two superstars and two all stars on GS and two super stars and role players on CLE.Based on what I saw in the finals, it was very clear to me that there are 2 superstars on each team....very clear.
Based on what I saw in the finals, it was very clear to me that there are 2 superstars on each team....very clear.
Like the Thunder in 2016? the Thunder that were up 3-1 against the Warriors? the Thunder that had KD who said this:
https://twitter.com/kdtrey5/status/18688294600?lang=en
More like two superstars and two all stars on GS and two super stars and role players on CLE.
Klay was off this entire playoff go around for GS, but we could say the same about Love.my guy, besides the obvious choices of Curry, Durant, Irving, James, it was Love who played the best among every other player averaging 16pts and 11trb.
Klay averaged 16 and 4.
It is what it is, I remember when he said that and I agreed with him. Did I like his decision? No, but it's just a game and at the end of the day if your team won 70 games and you could add a player like that then you do. It's simple.
If the Lakers back in 2012 could sign James don't you think they would? Kobe, James, Bynum would have been the team. This whole idea about being loyal etc etc benefits the owners only for not putting a team around said player. Again, I did not like the decision, however one can not deny that the Thunder committed too much money to Kendrick Perkins which caused them to lose out on Harden and the rest was history.
CLE also made horrible decision and listened to acting GM James when they overpaid back then for Anderson V, when they should have saved their money and go after the likes of a Bosh or Dwight Howard if not both back then.
Is it weak? Yea I can see why you say that.
Honestly it just makes me cringe, he's obviously free to go to whichever team he wants but he can't control how people feel about it warranted or not. Imagine Jordan in a Pistons jersey, or Bird in a Lakers jersey etc
Maybe...but MJ was just too busy winning.'Cmon Blood, you know that's not fair. MJ may have moved had he not been a part of the Bulls dynasty, same with Larry and the Celtics. Guys want rings, plain and simple.
Maybe...but MJ was just too busy winning.
Its not plagiarism if its my own words lol@usmccharles literally copying and pasting between here and rsr I see lol
correctumundoYou mean the Bulls were too busy winning.