Ehh, I mean, I think in a lot of these instances you're not actually taking the "contrarian view"... you're actually taking the majority view. The majority of fans, regardless of whether they support the team or not, overreact to literally everything they see, and typically react only to the most recent thing they see.
Like RSR is a notoriously over-reactionary site. Everybody is either terrible or great, depending on the last thing they saw. Every week we lose we need to fire X person or cut Y person or bench Z player for somebody else who already couldn't win the job. Week in, week out, same bullshit.
This just happens to be one of the few sites where the sky is not, in fact, falling every week. There's posters on here who think it is, and the gameday thread scares this shit out of me, because some of you guys don't even realize the level of inconsistency and stupidity in some of your posts on a play-by-play basis, but I've just learned not to read the gameday thread barely ever. It's magical.
I think most people would say your points of view aren't actually your points of view. They're taken from what others, like RSR, generally believe. Namely, we think that you think Hamilton sucks because he botched two plays terribly against Miami. And that unless he finishes the year with like 10 INTs, its unlikely you're going to move off that "take" anytime soon.
You can have that opinion if you want. You just can't expect others to agree with it, and can probably expect others to mock you for it. On other sites, you'd be preaching to the choir.
But don't worry... 5 minutes on Twitter makes even the dumbest posters on here look like future GM's of this team.
