JoeyFlex5
Hall of Famer
There’s a new or much more obvious undercurrent when discussing Lamar that I don’t care for. The conversation is no longer “how do you stop Lamar Jackson”, it’s “in order to stop Lamar Jackson you have to hurt him.” It’s a pretty gross sentiment and I think it’s irresponsible for pundits and former players to discuss it as a viable strategy. They act like it’s within the framework of the sport and the game, but it really isn’t. It’s no different than actively trying to hurt players at other positions on the field. There’s solid tackling and solid hits, trying to separate the ball from the player, etc. but that’s not what they’re talking about at all. They’re talking about blowing him up regardless of whether he has the ball or not with the sole purpose of hurting him. Listen to this.
To be fair, this has been the universal method for basically every dual threat qb running the read option. The same was said about Kaepernick, cam, and Tebow. It’s always been something that people just spew out of their mouths without thinking about the Xs and Os and how easy it is to wreck a gameplan if you’re committing a key defender to hitting a player who isn’t holding the ball. Imagine defenders tackling Tom brady after he hands the ball off just in case it’s play action and doing that EVERY PLAY, the run game would absolutely feast by just running traps and counters