Depends on who you ask. Multiple reporters who saw the original deal verified Schefter's account. The $133M is the only number both Lamar and everybody else agreed to, and it was the gtd at signing amount.I mean thats all lamar contract was though correct? Basically 3yr 133 million? not after that was gtd?
Yeah from what I've gathered, it sounds like the 3/$133M offer was one variation of an offer, essentially out to say if you want fully guaranteed, this is what we can do.Depends on who you ask. Multiple reporters who saw the original deal verified Schefter's account. The $133M is the only number both Lamar and everybody else agreed to, and it was the gtd at signing amount.
Bottom line... I don't think anybody really believe that the only contract offer the Ravens have made to Lamar is 3/133, fully gtd. That doesn't jive with literally anything the FO has said or has been reported by others.
Why would we increase the $133 mil. at signing? That's $23 mil. more than Hurts.Really makes you wonder at this point. Gotta think we'd slightly increase the guaranteed at signing if it was a reasonable counter, but it just seems like none of it has been. Hard to bridge a gap that large if he truly does want Watson levels, but this deal certainly doesn't help Lamar's case.
Oh i agree for sure and i was gonna type something similar.. i think lamar just want more fully guaranteed and not all that “ if” money.Depends on who you ask. Multiple reporters who saw the original deal verified Schefter's account. The $133M is the only number both Lamar and everybody else agreed to, and it was the gtd at signing amount.
Bottom line... I don't think anybody really believe that the only contract offer the Ravens have made to Lamar is 3/133, fully gtd. That doesn't jive with literally anything the FO has said or has been reported by others.
I wouldn't voluntarily. Just depends on if Lamar comes in with a counter himself that bridges the gap. I have no issue with paying a little more, but not going to negotiate against ourselves, obviously.Why would we increase the $133 mil. at signing? That's $23 mil. more than Hurts.
Right, which this contract isn't good for him, because the fully guaranteed portion is substantially less than what he was already offered.Oh i agree for sure and i was gonna type something similar.. i think lamar just want more fully guaranteed and not all that “ if” money.
Not saying I'd offer it, but let's just say Lamar comes back and counters with $150M. If I'm the Ravens, I'm probably taking it just to end the nightmare negotiations. Paying above market but not absurdly so.Why would we increase the $133 mil. at signing? That's $23 mil. more than Hurts.
Why can’t we just pay him 175 million guaranteed at signing with no additional funds for injury? That’s all he seems to care aboutHe reportedly had an additional $50M or so in roster bonuses that count as guaranteed money because it essentially is. Just not paid out at signing
Guessing cap structure reasons. Those roster bonuses are easy to kick out and convert for cap reasons. If you give him $175M as a signing bonus, that gets prorated and the only thing you can touch is the base salary at that point.Why can’t we just pay him 175 million guaranteed at signing with no additional funds for injury? That’s all he seems to care about
I think it would be different had Lamar not missed the last quarter of the past 2 seasons, or had a bunch of playoff success. I just don't know how anyone could justify paying any amount above market. Hurts is a couple of years younger, hasn't had the serious injury history.Not saying I'd offer it, but let's just say Lamar comes back and counters with $150M. If I'm the Ravens, I'm probably taking it just to end the nightmare negotiations. Paying above market but not absurdly so.
Because there's no reason to?Why can’t we just pay him 175 million guaranteed at signing with no additional funds for injury? That’s all he seems to care about
Ray was much different, a FA without the tag, and getting close to the end of his career.We let Ray Lewis test waters before
We are going to be fine and so is Lamar.
SIGN THE CONTRACT BIG BOY
Well, to be clear, the gtd $ at signing isn't just one bonus. It's bonuses and salaries combined. Nobody is giving a $175M signing bonus. I don't think anybody has come close to a $100M signing bonus. Not saying you don't know this, but more educational for the group.Guessing cap structure reasons. Those roster bonuses are easy to kick out and convert for cap reasons. If you give him $175M as a signing bonus, that gets prorated and the only thing you can touch is the base salary at that point.
Hmmm 175 would be difficult to effectively spread out over 3 yearsWell, to be clear, the gtd $ at signing isn't just one bonus. It's bonuses and salaries combined. Nobody is giving a $175M signing bonus. I don't think anybody has come close to a $100M signing bonus. Not saying you don't know this, but more educational for the group.
Kyler's deal had $103.3M gtd at signing. That's comprised of:
$29.0M signing bonus
2022 base salary = $965K
2023 base salary = $2M
2023 roster bonus = $36M
2024 salary = $35.3M
So his gtd at signing $ is spread over three years, in the form of $65M in two different bonuses, and $38.3M in base salaries.
Wilson's deal had $124M gtd at signing: That's comprised of:
$50M signing bonus
2022 base salary = $2M
2022 roster bonus = $5M
2023 base salary = $8M
2023 option bonus = $20M
2024 salary = $17M
2024 option bonus = $22M
With most of these long term deals, the gtd at signing $ is the only thing that's fully guaranteed, and its almost always paid out over 3 years. Hence the emphasis from Lamar on 3/133. It means even in the structure that Schefter reported, which was 5/260, the $133M is what's fully guaranteed, and what he would make in the first three years.
I think people tend to confused that the guaranteed at signing $ = what X player gets when he signs. That's rarely how it works. He's not getting $133M in a lump sum when he puts pen to paper. NFL Owners are rich and so are teams, but no Owner is going to pay out a bonus up front that large.
From a cap perspective, it would spread longer than that. That's just cash the player gets in that period of time.Hmmm 175 would be difficult to effectively spread out over 3 years
Yeah I should have been more detailed there. Would imagine in that scenario, $175M is tied across 3-5 years - signing bonus (length of contract) and base salaries (years 1-3). Just gets hard to move money around later in the life of the contract. That's why those roster bonuses are so popular... really easy to take that money, pay it out at the same time, but lengthen the cap hit by converting it to a signing bonus instead.Well, to be clear, the gtd $ at signing isn't just one bonus. It's bonuses and salaries combined. Nobody is giving a $175M signing bonus. I don't think anybody has come close to a $100M signing bonus. Not saying you don't know this, but more educational for the group.
Kyler's deal had $103.3M gtd at signing. That's comprised of:
$29.0M signing bonus
2022 base salary = $965K
2023 base salary = $2M
2023 roster bonus = $36M
2024 salary = $35.3M
So his gtd at signing $ is spread over three years, in the form of $65M in two different bonuses, and $38.3M in base salaries.
Wilson's deal had $124M gtd at signing: That's comprised of:
$50M signing bonus
2022 base salary = $2M
2022 roster bonus = $5M
2023 base salary = $8M
2023 option bonus = $20M
2024 salary = $17M
2024 option bonus = $22M
With most of these long term deals, the gtd at signing $ is the only thing that's fully guaranteed, and its almost always paid out over 3 years. Hence the emphasis from Lamar on 3/133. It means even in the structure that Schefter reported, which was 5/260, the $133M is what's fully guaranteed, and what he would make in the first three years.
I think people tend to confused that the guaranteed at signing $ = what X player gets when he signs. That's rarely how it works. He's not getting $133M in a lump sum when he puts pen to paper. NFL Owners are rich and so are teams, but no Owner is going to pay out a bonus up front that large.