10 years, $236M fully guaranteed. Take it or leave it.Lol so does this mean Lamar would take a 6 year 235M gauranteed? How about 7 years 235M. 8? 9? A Mahomes 10?
10 years, $236M fully guaranteed. Take it or leave it.Lol so does this mean Lamar would take a 6 year 235M gauranteed? How about 7 years 235M. 8? 9? A Mahomes 10?
In their minds, thats what he is doing lol. They cant believe he hasnt gotten into any trouble yet.. soon as he get a speeding ticket “ i mean he hangs around kodak black whose known for getting in trouble”….I agree with this, but Lamar hasn’t gotten into any kind of legal trouble as of yet and is well respected in the community and is a class act from what I’ve heard. It is concerning, but it’s not like Lamar is out there flashing tiny guns on Instagram like Ja
I doubt Bisciotti is willing to put 236 in escrow10 years, $236M fully guaranteed. Take it or leave it.
Twas a jokeI doubt Bisciotti is willing to put 236 in escrow
Lamar is definitely playing on the tag. If not, let his ass hold out and get nothing. Now we know why he had no interest
Lamar is definitely playing on the tag. If not, let his ass hold out and get nothing. Now we know why he had no interest
Lamar gets the choice to sign an offer sheet or not. He's not signing any deal that he doesn't want to sign.I have a question that I know for sure has been answered on here, so apologize. Hypothetically, if any team makes an offer, and let’s just say just one team does, and it’s a lowball offer, we match, is Lamar forced to accept it? Because that would be funny and awesome
I was looking forward to the commercials. lolI'm not going to lie I was hoping the Ravens could sign Baker Mayfield ........
I know i meant to reply to another post lol. i just wanted to highlight how unrealistic Lamar's expectations are.Twas a joke
Not sure I have a strong opinion either way, but will say there’s always some doubt when a guy is at the end of a contract and in contentious negotiations for an extension. “Business decisions” if you will.Marlo came out and said he noticed that he was limping. I think it's a non-story to be honest. However it appears there is a group of people who took this opportunity to start questioning him.
The question I would ask you then would be what did Lamar Jackson do prior to this to make you think or feel that he could play and chose not to?
Not sure I have a strong opinion either way, but will say there’s always some doubt when a guy is at the end of a contract and in contentious negotiations for an extension. “Business decisions” if you will.
I mean we've kinda known this for awhile. But what really matters is:
a) does he want more than Watson in guarantees AT SIGNING, or will he do rolling guarantees like literally everybody else?
b) how many years is he willing to sign for? Frankly, if he wants $235M gtd, he has a 0% chance of getting that unless he signs at least a 6 year deal, and probably closer to a 7-8 year deal.
Like asking for 5/250, with 235M guaranteed, is clearly a non-starter for all NFL teams. Even 6/300 with 235M guaranteed is probably pushing it.
Who knows. I guess if gets the guaranteed $ he wants, maybe.It would have to be 6 in order for the Ravens to give it some serious thought.
If you are Lamar, are you even interested in 6-7 year contracts?
Who knows. I guess if gets the guaranteed $ he wants, maybe.
I would think 6 is the max. If he's looking at 5 years and wants 235 guaranteed, he won't get it from anybody.
I'm not personally buying that its his only demand though. I think its one or the other.
I think its one of two things. He either wants $235M fully gtd on a 5 or 6 year deal, OR, he wants a 3 or probably a 4 year deal, fully gtd.
I'd love to see how he responds if somebody offers him 3/150, fully gtd.
With his injury history,not a chance.And that's my thing. Maybe it's just me, but I don't know if we'll even offer a 6-year deal.
Fuck, I’m so sick of this shit lolLamar gets the choice to sign an offer sheet or not. He's not signing any deal that he doesn't want to sign.
I don't know. I can't imagine we're opposed to a 3 year deal, given that EDC I believe publicly said they've tried "multiple types" of deals, which I assume means a shorter term one also. I'm sort of anti anything under 4 years, because it really limits cap flexibility. But I wouldn't be completely opposed to it.Would the Ravens do a 3 year 150? It doesn't sound that bad to me.