• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

2024 Training Camp

Wiggins looked great! Too much negativity in here, we’ll get some revenge lite week 1 and we’ll all feel stupid for overreacting

wiggins looked great
rosengarten looked good overall
isaac flashed in limited moments

other young guys in recent draft classes also flashed too and we might have found a starting LG with a 7th round pick (albeit he's had some struggles)

there's lots to feel positive about
 
Pepe vs Brade vs Hollman for DB11 regardless of the position specifics methinks with worley riding the PS and Kane in the 53
That’s one I’m kinda debating. I have 12 DBs but could absolutely see swapping Pepe for OL10 for the time being.

Also a world where we could just keep 2 RBs and use PS elevations for a few weeks.
 
That’s one I’m kinda debating. I have 12 DBs but could absolutely see swapping Pepe for OL10 for the time being.

Also a world where we could just keep 2 RBs and use PS elevations for a few weeks.

ive got 4 LBs but i also dont love keeping Josh Ross based on performance right now either
 
wiggins looked great
rosengarten looked good overall
isaac flashed in limited moments

other young guys in recent draft classes also flashed too and we might have found a starting LG with a 7th round pick (albeit he's had some struggles)

there's lots to feel positive about
Also Zay Flowers is about to become a top 5 WR
 
i dont think the back end is necessarily weaker - i think we've got more guys who are entrenched enough that they're not going to play a second of preseason we've got non-starting guys at various positions who havent played a snap of preseason because they dont need to

that obviously puts more pressure on depth but i just think it's more emblematic of how deep down the depth chart you have to go to find the preseason starters vs actual depth issues
The thought was the last few years I have had 54 to 56 guys (excluding wolfpack) I would want to make the team meaning there's multiple hard cuts. This year I don't even have 50. I have 49.
 
The thought was the last few years I have had 54 to 56 guys (excluding wolfpack) I would want to make the team meaning there's multiple hard cuts. This year I don't even have 50. I have 49.
This is kinda where I’m at. Usually there a couple of cuts that hurt a tad. This year there are a couple of guys making it that hurt a tad.
 
End of day reality is 32/32 teams would pick our defensive backs, and almost every team would pick our special teams, tight end group, running backs when Mitchell returns, and dline.

Our floor is certainly 10 wins, but I don't think anyone is happy with that. We should be competing for a Super Bowl, and if our best team couldn't beat the chiefs in a down year; how is a potentially terrible offensive line the answer to succeeding? We are lucky enough to be in a position to compete with anyone (mainly mahomes) so why are we relying on bums to block Lamar? If you buy a Ferrari, you should park in a garage, not on the street.
 
End of day reality is 32/32 teams would pick our defensive backs, and almost every team would pick our special teams, tight end group, running backs when Mitchell returns, and dline.

Our floor is certainly 10 wins, but I don't think anyone is happy with that. We should be competing for a Super Bowl, and if our best team couldn't beat the chiefs in a down year; how is a potentially terrible offensive line the answer to succeeding? We are lucky enough to be in a position to compete with anyone (mainly mahomes) so why are we relying on bums to block Lamar? If you buy a Ferrari, you should park in a garage, not on the street.
I really wish we would have kept at least one of Moses or Zeitler.
 
End of day reality is 32/32 teams would pick our defensive backs, and almost every team would pick our special teams, tight end group, running backs when Mitchell returns, and dline.

Our floor is certainly 10 wins, but I don't think anyone is happy with that. We should be competing for a Super Bowl, and if our best team couldn't beat the chiefs in a down year; how is a potentially terrible offensive line the answer to succeeding? We are lucky enough to be in a position to compete with anyone (mainly mahomes) so why are we relying on bums to block Lamar? If you buy a Ferrari, you should park in a garage, not on the street.
2011 ravens > 2012 ravens, an OL reshuffle propelled us to a Super Bowl.

Perhaps Ben Cleveland steps in late season and changes our fortunes.
 
I really wish we would have kept at least one of Moses or Zeitler.
Keeping just one allows you do to absolutely anything with the other and I would have faith. Having 3 new players, 2 who have never played next to each other, is just stupid. It doesn't matter if those are pro bowl players, you are asking a lot to learn how the other plays.

I know it will strengthen out later in the season, but if we want a good shot at the chiefs again, winning the north and avoiding Lamar bruises is a great direction.
 
So based on some preseason games its clear we need to sack EDC and Harbs and tank to get a better back up QB. You guys are starting to sound a lot like Ravens fans on social media lol.

Tank and draft Shedeur Sanders!
 
End of day reality is 32/32 teams would pick our defensive backs, and almost every team would pick our special teams, tight end group, running backs when Mitchell returns, and dline.

Our floor is certainly 10 wins, but I don't think anyone is happy with that. We should be competing for a Super Bowl, and if our best team couldn't beat the chiefs in a down year; how is a potentially terrible offensive line the answer to succeeding? We are lucky enough to be in a position to compete with anyone (mainly mahomes) so why are we relying on bums to block Lamar? If you buy a Ferrari, you should park in a garage, not on the street.

chiefs came off a bad OL year and inputted a 2nd rounder and a 6th rounder on their OL and went straight back to a superbowl win - they understood also that you have to get younger once you pay your QB especially if you havent got all-pros there (hence why they just paid creed humphrey)
 
chiefs came off a bad OL year and inputted a 2nd rounder and a 6th rounder on their OL and went straight back to a superbowl win - they understood also that you have to get younger once you pay your QB especially if you havent got all-pros there (hence why they just paid creed humphrey)
Yep. I believe the depth is weaker, but it's also totally understandable. You need guys on rookie contracts to play and play well when you have a QB and a host of other guys at or near the top of the market. Sucks when they don't rise to the occasion but the story isn't written and there are still opportunities to get better players if needed too. Not everything has to be some veteran that has been around the block.
 
Top