While Bell would have been nice solely for the fact that it's been a long time since this team has had a legit "superstar," I'm not hurt at all that we weren't even in. There's a lot of risk there, especially at that amount. I don't doubt that he would have made a big impact, but at the same time, it's a whole shitload of money to pay for a RB - even though I recognize that he does different things.
Otherwise, what is the expectation for DeCosta at this point? Are people really expecting him to go out and throw this big money at players who are clearly not worth it? I'd argue that Paradis is literally the only deal given so far that I would have matched, but his market was definitely slow and you have to think there's a deeper reason behind that. I don't know... I guess I just don't get it. You either complain about the fact that we have no players, or complain about the bad contracts and dead money. DeCosta is in a no win situation right now, and FA hasn't even technically started.
There are still a lot of quality players available and historically, that's where the Ravens do their work in FA. Let the bad teams throw the big money, and then come in and find the leftovers for a more reasonable rate. The Ingram deal would be surprising to me, but it would also depend on the numbers. I'd be highly shocked if it even approached $7.5M/year as some have said.
Just be patient. The only real guys we've lost so far are Mosley and Suggs. The rest were 100% expected. Mosley you simply couldn't pay $17M a year and I'd bet we can find better ways to spend that money, despite how much I wanted him to stay. Suggs is more of sentimental loss, and I'm sure we can find similar production for the money we were going to give him once things start to clear up.