So I largely agree with this take, BUT, this is gameplan specific to me.
AND, I'm not sure how well this works with Williams out. Quarters means you've basically got 7 DBs on the field. That's effective against a pass heavy team, but do we really think taking Onwausor off the field in favor of like Levine or even Clark/Elliott is going to help us defend the run without Williams?
I personally don't. If I were an OC, and I see you in quarters coverage to start a drive, I'm pounding Chubb over and over and over again, and probably in a no-huddle scheme. And I think I'd be pretty effective doing it.
If you have Williams, or are doing a better job stopping the run with 4-5 guys, I think this can work and work effectively. But there's a reason why a lot of teams won't play any more than 6 DBs, even in a pass heavy league.
I will praise Wink over Pees for one very important thing to me... Pees would never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, play anything more than Nickel coverages. He despised the the idea of having 6 DBs out there. Even in those infamous Pees games with the "prevent" defense, he still was out there with like 2-3 LBs on the field. It was comical. Most teams in this league basically have a "base" Nickel or Dime coverage (exactly what we do this year), and Pees would never do it. I believe the last year Pees was here, FilmStudy had him at like 10 Dime snaps the entire season. We play like 20-30 a week now, and I think we're better off for it (even if it doesn't show all the time).
Just imagine how bad this team would look on defense if we had Pees forcing us exclusively play Onwausor and Young/Board in coverage, regardless of game flow or success. You wouldn't even see somebody like Clark/Elliott or Levine on the field.