Tank
Hall of Famer
......and RBs/receivers.Their pass rush has less sacks than ours. I think this game will come down to which QB plays better.
......and RBs/receivers.Their pass rush has less sacks than ours. I think this game will come down to which QB plays better.
I would agree. I'm more concerned with Lockett than Metcalf. That being said, I don't think either will be shadowed.Everyone wants humph shadowing DJ I’m personally more concerned with Tyler Lockett him and Russ have a connection
I agree but I was surprised we shadowed Boyd either way I really really hope Jimmy is back or o think Russ has a field day unfortunately we are just a different D when jimmy and Marlon are out there it gives the pass rush just a little more timeI would agree. I'm more concerned with Lockett than Metcalf. That being said, I don't think either will be shadowed.
It does. I believe Boyd had been getting no less than 70 ypg coming into this game and that was why we decided to shadow him.I agree but I was surprised we shadowed Boyd either way I really really hope Jimmy is back or o think Russ has a field day unfortunately we are just a different D when jimmy and Marlon are out there it gives the pass rush just a little more time
It does. I believe Boyd had been getting no less than 70 ypg coming into this game and that was why we decided to shadow him.
unfortunately Tate destroyed Canady for most of the day.he was also with ross and green out, the only real receiving weapon on that bengals team who could threaten us with big plays so eliminating him made a lot of sense
Yes its good but i think a better tactic is putting your best cb on the 2nd wideout and doubling the main wr.. however, in pats case both edelman and gordon are the number 1’s lol. I think edleman isnt targeted deep that often thoughHump shadowing and taking out the best receiver is good. However I don't think he will be shadowing this week.
lockett is problem.. he really catches everthing forreal lol.. i thought we played the patriots this week lmaooI would agree. I'm more concerned with Lockett than Metcalf. That being said, I don't think either will be shadowed.
lol, Lockett is absolutely a problem and we play the Pats after the bye week.L
lockett is problem.. he really catches everthing forreal lol.. i thought we played the patriots this week lmaoo
Yes its good but i think a better tactic is putting your best cb on the 2nd wideout and doubling the main wr.. however, in pats case both edelman and gordon are the number 1’s lol. I think edleman isnt targeted deep that often though
You forgot to ping @Militant X 1Cat defense. Humphrey’s got that cat and Peters’ got that cat.
I didn’t say breakout so I think I’m safe.You forgot to ping @Militant X 1
Come on man, you said 'cat'. 3 times!!!!I didn’t say breakout so I think I’m safe.![]()
quarters was great but without Elliott not sure how we make this happen, unless we end up using Jackson as you said. Need 4 safeties to make it work though.not sure how we make this happen but i really liked the quarters coverage looks we used on sunday against the bengals with zero ILBs on the field but with elliott out there's no deep safety to operate (unless we trust bennet jackson lol) and allow chuck clark to get down in the box
my guess is we end up back in dime rather than quarters with levine as dime and then peanut or bynes as the LB
This is a statement game if there ever was one. Going to be a tough game and if we win we then damn. I think Clark could surprisingly be effective at spy on Wilson. The good news is we have Jackson and both are similar type of players but different strengths. Should be fun