• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

Next Up: @Seahawks

How many times do the Ravens sack Russell Wilson?


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
I would agree. I'm more concerned with Lockett than Metcalf. That being said, I don't think either will be shadowed.
I agree but I was surprised we shadowed Boyd either way I really really hope Jimmy is back or o think Russ has a field day unfortunately we are just a different D when jimmy and Marlon are out there it gives the pass rush just a little more time
 
I agree but I was surprised we shadowed Boyd either way I really really hope Jimmy is back or o think Russ has a field day unfortunately we are just a different D when jimmy and Marlon are out there it gives the pass rush just a little more time
It does. I believe Boyd had been getting no less than 70 ypg coming into this game and that was why we decided to shadow him.
 
It does. I believe Boyd had been getting no less than 70 ypg coming into this game and that was why we decided to shadow him.

he was also with ross and green out, the only real receiving weapon on that bengals team who could threaten us with big plays so eliminating him made a lot of sense
 
Hump shadowing and taking out the best receiver is good. However I don't think he will be shadowing this week.
Yes its good but i think a better tactic is putting your best cb on the 2nd wideout and doubling the main wr.. however, in pats case both edelman and gordon are the number 1’s lol. I think edleman isnt targeted deep that often though
 
Yes its good but i think a better tactic is putting your best cb on the 2nd wideout and doubling the main wr.. however, in pats case both edelman and gordon are the number 1’s lol. I think edleman isnt targeted deep that often though

gordon and brady havent really clicked properly this year - edelman is the clear number 1
 
Last edited:
Cat defense. Humphrey’s got that cat and Peters’ got that cat.
 
not sure how we make this happen but i really liked the quarters coverage looks we used on sunday against the bengals with zero ILBs on the field but with elliott out there's no deep safety to operate (unless we trust bennet jackson lol) and allow chuck clark to get down in the box

my guess is we end up back in dime rather than quarters with levine as dime and then peanut or bynes as the LB
 
not sure how we make this happen but i really liked the quarters coverage looks we used on sunday against the bengals with zero ILBs on the field but with elliott out there's no deep safety to operate (unless we trust bennet jackson lol) and allow chuck clark to get down in the box

my guess is we end up back in dime rather than quarters with levine as dime and then peanut or bynes as the LB
quarters was great but without Elliott not sure how we make this happen, unless we end up using Jackson as you said. Need 4 safeties to make it work though.
 
S H I T.

upload_2019-10-16_11-3-19.png
 
Top