Devito ,you may be the only one left who would take Perriman over Wallace.
wallace has been invisible to be fair outside of the oakland game
Devito ,you may be the only one left who would take Perriman over Wallace.
And Perriman?wallace has been invisible to be fair outside of the oakland game
And Perriman?
caught 3 balls this week... and nearly got a couple of deep balls too - not saying he's playing well but he was definitely being used more than wallace vs the titans
Only because he was targeted a lot possibly due to negative press from the Baltimore Sunthe week before the game.caught 3 balls this week... and nearly got a couple of deep balls too - not saying he's playing well but he was definitely being used more than wallace vs the titans
Either Joe was late throwing the ball or Perriman always seems to have a defender all over him .I cant even fault him (or Flacco) on that INT. It was a well thrown ball that hit him in stride but he was just hit so instantly that there was nothing he could do. I actually wish I had the time to time the exact length of time between when that ball touched him and when he got blown up because I have never seen a margin that close before in my years of watching football.
I haven't seen him plenty a lot of press this season, I think teams respect his size/speed but he has issues separating at the top of his routes, and he does not sell his routes. Honestly he is not polished receiver at all and I think his technique is very flawed.Either Joe was late throwing the ball or Perriman always seems to have a defender all over him .
Zero seperation. Ever. Even on short passes. Not good.
Really, I would have liked to have seen that article.Only because he was targeted a lot possibly due to negative press from the Baltimore Sunthe week before the game.
Only because he was targeted a lot possibly due to negative press from the Baltimore Sunthe week before the game.
They care. All of a sudden Perriman is targeted ? What a coincidence .im really not sure the team cares what the baltimore sun writes about them tbh - if they did then the pressers would surely be much less dull than they are
They care. All of a sudden Perriman is targeted ? What a coincidence .
He was targeted because he was open, that's it. @ravenslord the team absolutely doesn't give af about that article. Harbaugh said himself it wasn't their plan to target Perriman more last game, it just happened. Probably because Joe realized Perriman has been consistently getting open and decided to actually target him. I don't see how you wouldn't take Perriman over no show Wallace at this point. Of Perrimans 7 targets 2 were uncatchable, one was a perfect defensive play, one drop and 3 catches. It was an improvement from him and I hope he continues to see targets.he only had 7 targets - its not that different to the rest of the season - he just happened to have 3 catches (including a couple of first downs) and 2 missed deep balls that could have been big plays
i mean maclin had more targets...
are you implying Perriman was targeted more exclusively because the media suggested it ?They care. All of a sudden Perriman is targeted ? What a coincidence .
Well I’m wondering if the article was posted in the Ravens locker room . It seems to me they made a very concerted effort to get Perriman more involved .are you implying Perriman was targeted more exclusively because the media suggested it ?
I think the reason was the fact that Marty and Flacco finally decided to watch some 22 tapes.are you implying Perriman was targeted more exclusively because the media suggested it ?
Why would they watch Jimmy's tape? They aren't throwing on him in practice.I think the reason was the fact that Marty and Flacco finally decided to watch some 22 tapes.
I think the reason was the fact that Marty and Flacco finally decided to watch some 22 tapes.