i think it's a combination of things making harbs more aggressive in recent weeks
1) we've got such a banged up secondary that we cannot trust them to stop an offence with any sort of regularity so if you can take it out of their hands then greaet
2) he backs the offence to win it (to get 2 yards or to convert a 4th down etc.) - he'd rather put the ball in the QB's hands than in the defence's hands
3) punting has been very hit and miss this year - so not guaranteed to pin teams back anyway
4) with the depleted secondary, field goals arent doing us much good
it's making calls that ironically might have been tougher to make when we were healthier, really easy
Harbs is COTY
Anything can happen tho man. Their special teams suck, and the kicker was having issues. Plus we had just stopped them on the previous drive. At some point you have to let the players decide who wins. If our D dindnt get it done, then so be it. They played their asses off with what they had to play with. Queen had a great night tackle wise. I think he had 12 or 13 tackles. I just think this particular gofer 2 was wrong.
Next year there will be interest in him . Watch .I would be shocked to see a team trade a second. I'd be surprised to see a team trade for him this year at all.
Yeah, I could care less about being lucky. Just get the wins by any (legal) means necessary.No haven’t you heard, Ravens are lucky to have 8 wins
I definitely see the logic. They got a look at what the Packers defense was going to come out with. Andrews was uncoverable all night. It’s justifiable. But (a) Rodgers was just as likely to get the win in regulation with the Extra point or the PAT and (b) it’s a 50/50 chance the offense (which was pretty much good all night) starts with the ball in OT and gets the win without the defense even taking the field.
idk that he's worth more than a 2nd round pick to us...
he's certainly worth more to us than to other teams right now but not team's giving us a 2nd round pick for him lol
if a team wants to give us the draft capital to add a legit talent then we're 100% getting rid of ty and working out who our next backup project is/signing a veteran
I definitely see the logic. They got a look at what the Packers defense was going to come out with. Andrews was uncoverable all night. It’s justifiable. But (a) Rodgers was just as likely to get the win in regulation with the Extra point or the PAT and (b) it’s a 50/50 chance the offense (which was pretty much good all night) starts with the ball in OT and gets the win without the defense even taking the field.
haha - think the world would have exploded if we'd gone for 2 on the first one, failed, gone for 2 on the second one to go to overtime and failed again
but yeah this is why you go for 2 on the first TD so that if you dont make it you still have the ability to extend the game
I hear you, but he has enough sample size now to see given the current state of the Ravens players plus GRo what the outcomes look like. All I'm saying is if he decided to go to OT next time, I wouldn't be calling for his head for the mentality switch. I was fine with it again today, just not the playcall
if he were to stop calling it because he didnt trust the coordinator then that would be the biggest indicator yet that the coordinator's a problem
Didn't we say this with the Chiefs? No way Mahomes doesn't get a game winning situation? Yet we stopped the Chiefs on a 4th down. Anything could have happened, too bad we won't know because Harbs is too obsessed with terrible analytics.
Didn't we say this with the Chiefs? No way Mahomes doesn't get a game winning situation? Yet we stopped the Chiefs on a 4th down. Anything could have happened, too bad we won't know because Harbs is too obsessed with terrible analytics.
I'm just very on the fence if there is a real coordinator problem.