Just a funny speculation below, I have no basis whatsoever for this.
The talk is how Watson's deal screwed teams and facors Jackson, but what if it is the opposite?
Conventional wisdom has always said that trading for a high-end QB with two 1sts is a pretty much no-brainer.
But with Watson and Wilson last year looking like not-so-great trades thus far, could teams be hesitant for that simple reason? I don't really think that is the case, but considering how extremely trend-sensitive NFL teams are, maybe a little bit of that could go into it.
Anyways, *if* there was anything in that, I would find the irony off the scales if Watson's contract was a detriment to Jackson's contract/trade value