But nothing you said here means they didn't know anything. Why is it their job to speak about player injuries? How does it benefit the team in any possible way to publicly discuss any injuries?
The difference is some players injuries get worse over time, and some of them don't heal as quickly as the arbitrary public thinks they should, based on whatever bullshit timeline a national beat writer gives.
In this case, what's the argument over lack of info to the extent of the injury? The doctors have seen him. If they recommended surgery, so be it. In cases like Bateman, for example, doctors basically said "play with it and delay the surgery, or have the surgery now". Is there any evidence that any doctor, anywhere, ever, has said that about Lamar's injury?
You're putting way, way, way too much stock in the opinions of people who don't know dick think.
You said people "assumed". Who told you to assume? Why did you assume?