I can’t imagine there are many cases in history where a team had 1st ballot HOFs two years in a rowIt doesn’t look like any team has ever gone two years in a row.
I can’t imagine there are many cases in history where a team had 1st ballot HOFs two years in a row
I hope they don’t break the trend. While it’s cool to be in the HOF game, it’s really not a good thing to have to play the extra pre season game, especially having to travel to do so.I can’t imagine there are many cases in history where a team had 1st ballot HOFs two years in a row
Absolute joy to watch or nightmare, depending on who you were rooting for. He was the real 12th man, and 13th, 14th and 15th, for that matter.I cannot imagine anyone supplanting Reed as my all time favorite Raven. Beyond his incredible skill he just had a personality like no other. He was an absolute joy to watch.
Any discussion around whether he was 1st ballot was silliness. To not induct him this year would have been criminal. He was hands down the most electrifying defensive player of his generation
Congrats Ed!!
I hope they don’t break the trend. While it’s cool to be in the HOF game, it’s really not a good thing to have to play the extra pre season game, especially having to travel to do so.
While there may be some small advantage I’m sure the vets hate coming to camp a week earlier. And I think the consensus is that 4 pre season games alone are way too many. The risk of injuries in meaningless games doesn’t make sense as it seems coaches feel they don’t really need game action to evaluate players. Playing an extra one just piles on to the concerns. The only reason they haven’t cut to two is $.I think it helped us this year - it made the training camp less intense because it was spread out longer with more breaks
it gave us extra time to do everything while not physically expending any extra energy or anything + we got an extra game for those fringe players to make an impact
I was at this game sitting 5 rows up in the end zone where Ed finished. Epic moment.
Although I agree that four is too many preseason games, but only when referring to veterans. The rookies need the gametime experience and if you cut a game, they won’t have that last game that is extremely important for those borderline players.While there may be some small advantage I’m sure the vets hate coming to camp a week earlier. And I think the consensus is that 4 pre season games alone are way too many. The risk of injuries in meaningless games doesn’t make sense as it seems coaches feel they don’t really need game action to evaluate players. Playing an extra one just piles on to the concerns. The only reason they haven’t cut to two is $.
Regardless, I’d be very surprised to see the Ravens play in the HOF game two years in a row.
Having more pre season games for the benefit of a handful of players really doesn’t make sense and the coaches can well decide on borderline players without playing meaningless games. Pretty sure the only reason they still play 4 is because the owners don’t want to give up the revenue.Although I agree that four is too many preseason games, but only when referring to veterans. The rookies need the gametime experience and if you cut a game, they won’t have that last game that is extremely important for those borderline players.
Having more pre season games for the benefit of a handful of players really doesn’t make sense and the coaches can well decide on borderline players without playing meaningless games. Pretty sure the only reason they still play 4 is because the owners don’t want to give up the revenue.
Considering the emphasis being placed on player safety and improving the quality of play it would seem changes to pre season are inevitable. I think they most likely go to two games and maybe look at adding another bye week to the schedule.
Although I agree that four is too many preseason games, but only when referring to veterans. The rookies need the gametime experience and if you cut a game, they won’t have that last game that is extremely important for those borderline players.
Itts not the 4th game they should give up but the 1st. Starters used to play one drive but now they sitting most of the time. So eliminate it. The 4th game is needed imo cuz these players have practiced and worked hard all offseason so they should have at least a showcase game to show their talents plus 2 weeks rest are given to the regulars.
That’s the point, they need this game, but If they were to eliminate a game it would end up hurting the borderline players, because it would be the 4th game that is eliminated. They would need time for the vets in all three games and they would play more in these games since we wouldn’t have a 4th game. If you are saying to eliminate game 1, then the vets would play more in games 2 and 3, without having a game for for the rookies and borderline players.Itts not the 4th game they should give up but the 1st. Starters used to play one drive but now they sitting most of the time. So eliminate it. The 4th game is needed imo cuz these players have practiced and worked hard all offseason so they should have at least a showcase game to show their talents plus 2 weeks rest are given to the regulars.
it doesnt matter which game they eliminate lol