You ever see Trump do that to go after a leak. When you see news organazations constantly just put up only negative material personally I believe Trump has every right to say what he says. I mean when you're constantly called a Nazi and want to kill women and babies...……….
The pizza pedophile was just so absolutely ridiculous and I don't even know where that came from but it had to be from a real obscure newssource. There was conspiracy to railroad Bernie.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/damaging-emails-dnc-wikileaks-dump/story?id=40852448. Wikileaks bro. Remember them. Can you trust ABC? Its interesting how he's called the MAGAbomber. If newssources were fair how come housewhip Steve Scalise's shooter was not called the BERNIEshooter and then blame Bernie's rhetoric. Now my favorite the caravan you don't believe that the women with the children were put to the forefront by the agenda driven media? Really lmao. The major bulk of this caravan is working fighting aged men and by a longshot. Heck its even a strong possibility that these are unaccompanied minors that are being smuggled. I mean have you not noticed food trucks, medicine and gasp clean clothes being provided and you don't believe there is money behind all this.
Again I agree that the Obama administration overreached (in this case I believe in smaller, more transparent government so it's an area where I tend to agree with the right - or at least what the right pays lip service to when they're in opposition), but again that's not the same thing as using incendiary rhetoric at your rallies about people on your shitlist. It's a separate conversation.
*The Wikileaks stuff doesn't say much beyond many DNC figures not liking him - so I can agree depending on your definition of whether he was railroaded. I'd agree that people in the DNC old boys club didn't like him and that it played out in the nomination process, but again that just means the DNC has a crappy selection process (the Republicans' one is better but not a huge amount better) rather than a concerted effort from the top. The truth is usually simpler than the shady explanations may make out.
*Call him the Bernieshooter if you want. I don't care. The point I was making was that if I were to argue that it was a Republican operative in a false flag operation I'd be wrong when he was clearly an unhinged person acting on his own accord, as was this MAGAbomber bloke. The truth is usually simpler than the shady explanations may make out.
*I'll leave
@rossihunter2 to argue the caravan stuff. But every time someone brings up left-wing politics the right likes to talk about how crap things are in central America, so is it a stretch to think that they might want to leave those countries? Or that international humanitarian organisations are providing some kind of assistance (given the UN's already involved and that this has happened before)? If you think left-wing figures giving them a nudge (and giving the right a talking point) is the simplest explanation that makes the most sense we'll have to agree to disagree.
*The "real obscure newssource" is the issue I have. A crazy person read a crazy theory on the internet and people died as a result. Conspiracy theories aren't a new thing (9/11, the moon landing, vaccinations, etc) but they're becoming more prominent and bad information spreads faster than good. That's why I went on my "everyone needs to double-check their sources" soliloquy and why I tried to phrase it in a non-partisan way and provide what I genuinely hope was useful pointers for people. And that if people only take one thing I say to heart, that it'd be to be careful with where you get your information and to try to find other sources that say the same stuff where applicable. If one person on the internet starts applying more of a filter to what they read then I can die happy. Everyone else can ignore the rest of what I say as the opinion of some flog on the internet.
