Inqui
Pro Bowler
Short answer, no it's not a conspiracy and it's an issue that doesn't get enough attention. Long answer... it's complicated and it depends on how much time you have.The following thread is not mine at all nor do I take credit for it.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1054466550433042432.html
It's a 61 tweet thread that goes in to detail about China trying to influence its interests onto key U.S. institutions. It's well worth a read. Conspiracy or nah?
Australia's torn between the US being its top security partner and China being its top trading partner. And the security community there is torn between the doves who think China represents the biggest opportunity in several generations and the hawks who think China represents the biggest security threat in generations (this debate's going on in policy circles all over the world including the US atm but it's especially big in Australia). Both sides overstate their positions but the reality is that they're both right.
I'll try to find examples of both ends of the spectrum but the IP theft issue has been a complaint from corporations for a while now from all around the world; airlines facing penalties for having Taiwan on their flight networks (as opposed to Taipei); Party-aligned think-tanks and grants; one Australian senator having his debts paid in return for taking a pro-China stance on certain issues; security questions from the state-owned companies in the tech sector in particular (though iirc a DoD report recently said these weren't as bad as people think) and sovreign risks for private companies like Huawei (their own government doesn't make it easy for them) and so on.
It's not a mainstream issue yet but I can see it being the top foreign policy issue during one of the next three presidential elections, if not the biggest issue period. And true to form with partisan issues, the debate will lose all sense of nuance and will trigger me immensely lol. One thing I'll say I respect Trump for is that he was the first mainstream candidate to make it a high-priority issue, even if I think his trade approach is completely wrong-headed.
Long story short, it's definitely something governments need to be awake to, though I'd also say a nuanced approach is needed because it's not necessarily an existential issue and there are still a lot of opportunities for growth and prosperity for everyone. I believe it was page 35 or so where I started banging on about this so it's a topic I've got a lot of interest in. So it'll be a shame when both sides make it a blindly partisan issue haha.