Wilson was who I'd have voted for internally.Me neither. I was actually shocked. Seems like Dennard Wilson was the obvious choice in retrospect
Wilson was who I'd have voted for internally.Me neither. I was actually shocked. Seems like Dennard Wilson was the obvious choice in retrospect
Holy fuck my perception of time is dogshitYou realize Orr got his 2nd team in 2016 and Bobby was drafted in 2012? He wasn't on the back end of his career then.
Defense isn't going to get much better if at all, but there is no reason to be upset after beating up on our little brother again. Just enjoy the ride and hope it all clicks during the playoffsThe defensive playcalling will cost us a loss in the playoffs unless it improves .
Yeah it was a fun game .
Why does Roquan in this D look so out of sorts ? He looks flustered and he’s one of the best middle linebackers in the NFL.
Your best players playing well under their talent is a BAD sign .
Wilson wasn't staying here. He had a connection with Callahan and wanted to be with him in TN. I would have liked Wilson as well.Wilson was who I'd have voted for internally.
Lamar is the best player and QB in 2024 and it is not close
I wonder if the Ravens will replace Orr with Deen Pees and put Orr back in another defensive coaching position.
If it gets any worse , it just might happen.
Of course you did, DB guy.Wilson was who I'd have voted for internally.
It was better on paper but what reason would there have been to believe that we learned anything from the Cincy game? The only reason we didn't give up 5TDs and a million yards was because we played a way worse team. Despite that we did very little to stop them at all.i dont get the doom and gloom
yes there were some things of concern with the communication issues
but idk that this game was an awful defensive outing - i dont love the the all-out blitz call on the nate wiggins DPI and some other things but i really dont think it was a terrible outing
The secondary and linebackers look lost in coverage . Completely. Confused at times .i dont get the doom and gloom
yes there were some things of concern with the communication issues
but idk that this game was an awful defensive outing - i dont love the the all-out blitz call on the nate wiggins DPI and some other things but i really dont think it was a terrible outing
I agree with you but maybe they gave him the position a little too soon .I think Zach Orr got what's it takes to be a good defensive coordinator if not better. Deans Pees helps with that. His defense only gave up 23 points to the number 1 scoring offense. That's a good step in the right direction .
It was better on paper but what reason would there have been to believe that we learned anything from the Cincy game? The only reason we didn't give up 5TDs and a million yards was because we played a way worse team. Despite that we did very little to stop them at all.
Info I got at the time was that Wilson was the guy... before teams started calling on Orr. They thought he'd be a future DC, just maybe not as quick as it happened. I don't know that they panicked, but the certainly feared losing Orr. Only time will tell whether that works out or not.Wilson was who I'd have voted for internally.
I'm also in the camp of thinking there were still concerning things on D, but it was still a pretty sizable step up. Outside of the blitz already mentioned, I didn't see anything super egregious. I saw issues that still persist, but not near as frequently as they have the past 3 games.
I think it's just easy to blame coaches honestly. I'll never absolve them of all blame of course, but it's not like Orr is the one out there blowing coverages.and i think, again, a lot of the issues look like execution issues
there were certain plays that felt situationally poor playcalls but not that many - maybe needs to have a rethink about how they're communicating on the back-end - repeated issues in that area
nothing fundamentally broken about this defence though
I think it's just easy to blame coaches honestly. I'll never absolve them of all blame of course, but it's not like Orr is the one out there blowing coverages.
I'll maintain that there are some issues, but they've gotten better and I'd be surprised if they don't continue to get better. Easy to forget that it's only been 6 games too.
I agree with you but maybe they gave him the position a little too soon .