• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Be sure to sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

Terrell Suggs: Can/should we get him?

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
no he can't do that

he technically can but the team would have to not put him on the reserve/retired list despite his stated retirement - unlikely a team would do that if their aim in the first place was to stop him playing for us

there's a way that could happen but it would be a bizarre situation for it to happen - unless teams dont believe he'll follow through with refusing to play and are signing him for non-vindictive reasons and just wanted him to play
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
he technically can but the team would have to not put him on the reserve/retired list despite his stated retirement - unlikely a team would do that if their aim in the first place was to stop him playing for us

there's a way that could happen but it would be a bizarre situation for it to happen - unless teams dont believe he'll follow through with refusing to play and are signing him for non-vindictive reasons and just wanted him to play
but he can't retire and deside to come back because that team would have right of first refusal.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
but he can't retire and deside to come back because that team would have right of first refusal.

that's correct if they move him to the reserve/retired list - which they would likely do - but if they dont and they get rid of him to create space on the 53 then he'd be free to sign anywhere (after going through waivers again)

its incredibly unlikely - would require a team that claimed him on waivers being actively kind to sizzle in that situation (in which case they likely wouldnt have claimed him in the first place
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
that's correct if they move him to the reserve/retired list - which they would likely do - but if they dont and they get rid of him to create space on the 53 then he'd be free to sign anywhere (after going through waivers again)

its incredibly unlikely - would require a team that claimed him on waivers being actively kind to sizzle in that situation (in which case they likely wouldnt have claimed him in the first place
everyone knows who he wants to play for and that is what is going to make tomorrow so interesting. We won't claim him either, if we even have a chance to make a claim. If we do that, then we have 2m cap hit next season due to the voidable yrs contract. We would most likely let him get through waivers and then sign him to a contract for the remainder of the season, to finish out his career.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
everyone knows who he wants to play for and that is what is going to make tomorrow so interesting. We won't claim him either, if we even have a chance to make a claim. If we do that, then we have 2m cap hit next season due to the voidable yrs contract. We would most likely let him get through waivers and then sign him to a contract for the remainder of the season, to finish out his career.

there'd be no guaranteed money in that 2nd year though - all the dead cap is in arizona and he's only due game checks at this point so no reason we wouldnt claim him and then either let him retire a raven or release him next offseason (or keep him at the 3m it would cost)
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
there'd be no guaranteed money in that 2nd year though - all the dead cap is in arizona and he's only due game checks at this point so no reason we wouldnt claim him and then either let him retire a raven or release him next offseason (or keep him at the 3m it would cost)
this is true. Guaranteed doesn't transfer
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
there'd be no guaranteed money in that 2nd year though - all the dead cap is in arizona and he's only due game checks at this point so no reason we wouldnt claim him and then either let him retire a raven or release him next offseason (or keep him at the 3m it would cost)
I know that, I'm agreeing with you. The reason for the 2nd year was the voidable year to spread the guaranteed signing bonus over two seasons and we don't have to worry about the signing bonus if we claim him.

I'm not sure why you say it wold cost 3m. I'm not seeing a salary in year two at all.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
I know that, I'm agreeing with you. The reason for the 2nd year was the voidable year to spread the guaranteed signing bonus over two seasons and we don't have to worry about the signing bonus if we claim him.

I'm not sure why you say it wold cost 3m. I'm not seeing a salary in year two at all.

he signed a 2 year 10m deal with 4m signing bonus and 3m base salary this year - only 2m dead money showing in year 2 of deal so no guaranteed money in year 2 - so did the maths and means there's a 3m salary in year 2 also
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
he signed a 2 year 10m deal with 4m signing bonus and 3m base salary this year - only 2m dead money showing in year 2 of deal so no guaranteed money in year 2 - so did the maths and means there's a 3m salary in year 2 also
I don't think so, because the contract shows a salary of zero dollars (under base salary). I agree it was a 4m signing bonus, spread over two seasons and that won't carry over if we claim him off waivers. However I don't think their actually is a year two to the deal, other than being a voidable year.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
I don't think so, because the contract shows a salary of zero dollars (under base salary). I agree it was a 4m signing bonus, spread over two seasons and that won't carry over if we claim him off waivers. However I don't think their actually is a year two to the deal, other than being a voidable year.

maybe it was automatically voided by him being waived but im pretty sure he signed a 2 year 10m deal
 

JO_75

Hall of Famer
We won't know nothing until 4PM correct? The only two teams I've heard who could put a claim in are the Titans and 49ers.

Sucks someone who has been in the league as long as Suggs has to still go through waivers. That's another thing the NFLPA needs to fight for, after x amount of years in the league, your no longer subject to the waiver wire.
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
We won't know nothing until 4PM correct? The only two teams I've heard who could put a claim in are the Titans and 49ers.

Sucks someone who has been in the league as long as Suggs has to still go through waivers. That's another thing the NFLPA needs to fight for, after x amount of years in the league, your no longer subject to the waiver wire.
not unless another team claims him. He clears waivers at 4pm
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
maybe it was automatically voided by him being waived but im pretty sure he signed a 2 year 10m deal
well if you click on his name in spotrac.com, you'll see that there wasn't a base salary. If he signed a 2 yr 10m contract, then he would have a salary for next season. Anyway, either way, we no none of the guaranteed money would be transferred over if we claim him.
 

rossihunter2

Staff Member
Moderator
well if you click on his name in spotrac.com, you'll see that there wasn't a base salary. If he signed a 2 yr 10m contract, then he would have a salary for next season. Anyway, either way, we no none of the guaranteed money would be transferred over if we claim him.

in which case there's literally no reason not to claim him on waivers vs letting him hit free agency lol - the difference in contract value is about 200k over these last 2 games vs vet minimum
 

RavensMania

Staff Member
Administrator
in which case there's literally no reason not to claim him on waivers vs letting him hit free agency lol - the difference in contract value is about 200k over these last 2 games vs vet minimum
yes, this I agree with. I only said this because it had slipped my mind that the prorated signing bonus didn't transfer.
 
Top