probably, I mean their have been some 70 + point games beforeThe Ravens had more points than plays this week...
we literally averaged over 1 point per snap - that is outrageous... has that ever happened before in the NFL?
probably, I mean their have been some 70 + point games beforeThe Ravens had more points than plays this week...
we literally averaged over 1 point per snap - that is outrageous... has that ever happened before in the NFL?
I got dizzy watching that spin moveI am seeing that lamar spin move everywhere rn. Cant get enough of it. So smooth
Also him wearing shades on the bench is about to become a meme
Does anyone know what our time of possession was for this game? IIRC, the Bengals dominated it with like 40 something minutes. That's BEYOOOOOOOOONNNNDD absurd given how we annihilated them on the scoreboard.
Eisenberg said they had the ball 12+ more minutes than we didDoes anyone know what our time of possession was for this game? IIRC, the Bengals dominated it with like 40 something minutes. That's BEYOOOOOOOOONNNNDD absurd given how we annihilated them on the scoreboard.
and almost had another touchdownI'd just love to reiterate, Nick Boyle who blocks as well as a tackle but who is an eligible receiver had 4 catches for 78 yards today after he had 5 catches against the pats
That dot on the far right is marcus peters...
https://twitter.com/fbgchase/status/1193606056410320896/photo/1
Got to him an extension. The dude has ridiculous instincts and speed.
Was just thinking about this today, what a draft pick he turned out to be. A lot of winning teams reportedly really wanted him this offseason, we extended him, fans laughed, including me, and holy hell hes turned out to be maybe the 2nd most important player in this schemeI'd just love to reiterate, Nick Boyle who blocks as well as a tackle but who is an eligible receiver had 4 catches for 78 yards today after he had 5 catches against the pats
If we pay both Peters and Marlon (there's no scenario we don't pay Marlon), I think there's a couple things that for certain will happen:honestly i think we're paying him and i think we're probably paying marlon too and EDC isnt gonna worry that they play the same position because they're both that good in this defence
I think we should get rid of carr and jeffro for sure.. idk about payiny skura though. One good year doesnt cut it for me, seen it happen too many times on our team.If we pay both Peters and Marlon (there's no scenario we don't pay Marlon), I think there's a couple things that for certain will happen:
1. We won't be able to resign Judon
2. There's no way we keep Jimmy and Carr, and maybe not either
3. We cut Jefferson.
I actually don't terribly mind the idea of paying a lot in the secondary. If you're not going to pay Judon, you might as well go youth and volume at pass rush, and there's nobody on offense that you'd need to extend at this point, with the exception of Stanley. Even if you pay Skura, it'll be at average starter money.
About 12.5 minutes more. Bengals had the ball for 36 minutes in this game, and scored 13 points.Eisenberg said they had the ball 12+ more minutes than we did
Maybe. He's an RFA next year, which means you're going to pay him $3-4M to keep him for another year anyway, and at that price I guarantee we will.I think we should get rid of carr and jeffro for sure.. idk about payiny skura though. One good year doesnt cut it for me, seen it happen too many times on our team.
lol, I couldn't get up fast enough
If we pay both Peters and Marlon (there's no scenario we don't pay Marlon), I think there's a couple things that for certain will happen:
1. We won't be able to resign Judon
2. There's no way we keep Jimmy and Carr, and maybe not either
3. We cut Jefferson.
I actually don't terribly mind the idea of paying a lot in the secondary. If you're not going to pay Judon, you might as well go youth and volume at pass rush, and there's nobody on offense that you'd need to extend at this point, with the exception of Stanley. Even if you pay Skura, it'll be at average starter money.