Militant X 1
Ravens Ring of Honor
You caught me! Older eyes. Lol!Hearing rumors from my sources that Kyler Hamilton and Reggie Stanley are both out for the year
You caught me! Older eyes. Lol!Hearing rumors from my sources that Kyler Hamilton and Reggie Stanley are both out for the year
We finna lose nowDamn. I guess the Jaguars game means so little where there's not even a "Next Up: @ Jaguars" thread? Insanity....
Ain't no way was I making that thread. We lost the last time I did that shit (week 1 of last season).We finna lose now
Ain't no way was I making that thread. We lost the last time I did that shit (week 1 of last season).
Thanks for the LI made it, it’s up now
Thanks for the L
Found this interesting. Curious how Y'all might respond.
Human rights are the same all over the world. If fellow humans can't be treated equally regardless of who they can love, that country needs to be called out. It is not just about views and beliefs that are coerced onto the public by patriarchal fiefdoms and kingdoms. If they want to integrate into the world by hosting the most watched event in sports, then they need to accommodate the viewing public that has traveled there.He's correct. Who the hell are we to police other countries' views and beliefs?
We don't determine what's right in other countries. They went there knowing what that country is about. Don't like it. Don't go.Human rights are the same all over the world. If fellow humans can't be treated equally regardless of who they can love, that country needs to be called out. It is not just about views and beliefs that are coerced onto the public by patriarchal fiefdoms and kingdoms. If they want to integrate into the world by hosting the most watched event in sports, then they need to accommodate the viewing public that has traveled there.
Depends on how you define "human rights".Human rights are the same all over the world. If fellow humans can't be treated equally regardless of who they can love, that country needs to be called out. It is not just about views and beliefs that are coerced onto the public by patriarchal fiefdoms and kingdoms. If they want to integrate into the world by hosting the most watched event in sports, then they need to accommodate the viewing public that has traveled there.
Depends on how you define "human rights".
You can call out the Country all you want. But when you travel there, and pretend like their laws or rules don't exist because you arbitrarily think that morally they're "wrong", you pay the price. Ask Brittany Griner how that's working out for her. We can argue all day long about whether the punishment is too severe (which in my opinion, it absolutely is), but these people that plead ignorance in foreign countries about laws need a wake up call and a fast one.
And lets not be naïve here. Qatar isn't hosting the WC because they want to "integrate into the World". It's a revenue generating event. They used migrant workers who were paid practically nothing to construct stadiums that they'll probably tear down or abandon within weeks after the event.
After the WC is over, Qatar won't be changing any of its laws, rules, or morals because the hosted the WC. They wanted foreigners to come there and spend their money in their country so they can keep it. That's what the WC is.
No better example of this than their Government banning alcohol sales within stadiums. That was a smack in the face to Western "culture" and pissed off a ton of people. And those people all bitched about it on social media, etc., and Qatar's response was simply "go fuck yourself". And guess what? Those people did fuck off, because they have no choice but to fuck off.
End of day, the guy in this photo is nothing more than a Futbol reporter who's wearing a Gay Pride shirt in a foreign country to get a rise out of people. That's it.
There's also a shit load of irony in how Americans (and to a certain extend, the West in general) perceive "human rights". Pretty much fundamentally, "human rights" are a foundation based on some sort of religious-based aspect.Yes. Just as we expect foreigners to respect our laws, we need to be just as respectful as theirs. Totally agreed
Found this interesting. Curious how Y'all might respond.
The line between beliefs(often also moral convictions)and rights has become blurred and confused. Many have taken the basic human right of “live and let live” and stretched it to “accept how I live and make it a part of your life/beliefs” or else you are violating my human rights. Just because someone doesn’t believe in a person’s choices and lifestyle, that doesn’t mean they “hate” or dislike that person.There's also a shit load of irony in how Americans (and to a certain extend, the West in general) perceive "human rights". Pretty much fundamentally, "human rights" are a foundation based on some sort of religious-based aspect.
Americans are super OK with constant criticism and mocking of Christianity and its belief systems, but somehow are delicately sensitive to the criticism of literally any other religious belief system (in current pop-culture... anti-Semitism).
So laughably, at some point, we decided "thou shall not make fun of other religions", but we simultaneously decided "we're going to dictate human rights to everybody", which is, by definition, based on religious beliefs in most cases.
Can't have both. If you take the stance of being respectful of other cultures religions, then that includes being respectful of their cultures, because fundamentally, those cultures are based on their religious beliefs.
It was about a reporter being denied admission into a stadium in Quatar because he was wearing a gay pride shirt. I looked for a link but couldn’t readily find one that included the response from the Quatar gov, like the one that was posted.Post was removed but based on responses I’d like to see it lol
The line between beliefs(often also moral convictions)and rights has become blurred and confused. Many have taken the basic human right of “live and let live” and stretched it to “accept how I live and make it a part of your life/beliefs” or else you are violating my human rights. Just because someone doesn’t believe in a person’s choices and lifestyle, that doesn’t mean they “hate” or dislike that person.
To be fair, I don’t think human right to life and liberty is religious based. Now, if you wanna point out hypocrisy of one peoples cries for human rights conflicting with their own history(ie slavery, Jim Crow, genocide, etc.) that’s another discussion, but in the Middle East it’s not even much of a debate, it’s not that they’re trying to cover up dirty past injustices like the west does, the Middle East is pretty much leading the modern world in the “oppress human rights” category, and they are the ones who use religion to do so.There's also a shit load of irony in how Americans (and to a certain extend, the West in general) perceive "human rights". Pretty much fundamentally, "human rights" are a foundation based on some sort of religious-based aspect.
Americans are super OK with constant criticism and mocking of Christianity and its belief systems, but somehow are delicately sensitive to the criticism of literally any other religious belief system (in current pop-culture... anti-Semitism).
So laughably, at some point, we decided "thou shall not make fun of other religions", but we simultaneously decided "we're going to dictate human rights to everybody", which is, by definition, based on religious beliefs in most cases.
Can't have both. If you take the stance of being respectful of other cultures religions, then that includes being respectful of their cultures, because fundamentally, those cultures are based on their religious beliefs.