Because I mentioned him yesterday and this is the first mention I've seen of him entirely, here's the Broderick Washington update...
not a good sign for someone wanting to make it on the 53 to be basically unnoticed and forgotten about lol
If barner makes it, i think moore is def gone... i forgot he is a great gunner so nvmTrue, but just goes to my point about challenges of roster construction and how its not wise to pigeon hole yourself into thinking "we need X number of players for each group".
My best example is Kenjon Barner. If he makes the team as a kick returner, that's a 6th RB (including Ricard). I bet you won't find any other team in the league carrying 6 RBs. Where is that roster spot coming from? If I just pull from Simba's mock roster, conceding its not 100% accurate obviously, its hard to find. Doesn't appear it'll be from the offensive side of the ball, as we're pretty light there already, unless we opt to only keep 8 Olineman.
So one would think it would be from the defensive side of the ball, with the Secondary having the largest group.
Interesting question that I've been thinking about... do we even carry 3 TEs? It sounds like Ricard's role is pretty much strictly offense at this point and they've talked up his inline blocking. Is it too far our of the question that we stack up the PS in case the need arises? I like Scarff and Wolf but I don't have much question that the team can survive without one of them if Ricard steps up to the plate.
I think we carry 3 TEs because of special teams. They usually play on the ends and i don't see anyone else on the roster who could do itInteresting question that I've been thinking about... do we even carry 3 TEs? It sounds like Ricard's role is pretty much strictly offense at this point and they've talked up his inline blocking. Is it too far our of the question that we stack up the PS in case the need arises? I like Scarff and Wolf but I don't have much question that the team can survive without one of them if Ricard steps up to the plate.
I really think proche has potential. Idk if its gonna be here or elsewhere but he can be a great slot
guy.
I think we carry 3 TEs because of special teams. They usually play on the ends and i don't see anyone else on the roster who could do it
on those lines, they've been talking also about expanding ricard's role as you say with the in-line blocking and he always seems to be around the TE group - he's obviously not the dynamic receiving threat that hayden hurst was nor is he as athletic generally but he's certainly a factor at that position i suppose
it still feels light to not even have a 3rd on the roster and if i remember correctly harbs seemed to pretty clearly indicate there was a battle for that 3rd TE spot between Wolf and Scarff as if it's guaranteed that the 3rd TE spot exists
it's something ive thought about but i dont think it'll happen
I think we carry 3 TEs because of special teams. They usually play on the ends and i don't see anyone else on the roster who could do it
Just food for thought. I'm of the opinion that they'll keep a TE3 but I wouldn't call it a certainty. Just... are you really going to miss Scarff or Wolf on your 53 when both will likely be on the PS and available if you need them? Are they going to get enough snaps to make it worth it? How comfortable are you taking the risk that if someone gets hurt, you have to make it through with a 300 lb guy at TE for the rest of a game? If you carry and activate 6 WRs, do you have room to activate a TE3 along with the 4 RBs and Ricard?
these are the questions you have when your roster is stacked and the coaches care a lot about special teams
I'll tell you - I'm glad that arguably the biggest debate we have is a TE3. We've been in much worse situations. Hell, just last year I think we were wondering if we even had 5 WRs worth making the roster. Michael Floyd vs. Seth Roberts was a debate that some were having.