That seems a tad excessive. Hopefully they can trade some of them for current NFL talent to take a flier on.
I see. I still don't get how our FO thinks getting a player to switch position (in day 2) is a better idea than getting someone who's always played single deep and even do so within a reasonable time.I don't know. I think Safety is a position we should address. Elliott is in the final year of his contract and he's more of a SS. I'd love Johnson or Ardarius Washington and both are still on the board
a few years ago, maybe 2017 give or take a year or two. That was a very bad class in terms of depth. Think it was worst that year than it was this year.no idea - but this is one of the smallest classes ever in terms of draftable players and players hoping to be udfas too
2022 expected to be much bigger according to lots of experts - but idk about the strengths yet
Going through spotrac rosters now, looking for affordable players with 1 year left in their contract..That seems a tad excessive. Hopefully they can trade some of them for current NFL talent to take a flier on.
no idea - but this is one of the smallest classes ever in terms of draftable players and players hoping to be udfas too
2022 expected to be much bigger according to lots of experts - but idk about the strengths yet
And on to round 5 we go!
proche also has an extra year of control and more of a chance to develop at this point in his career - also can return punts if duv's not able to go - better route runner than boykin and duvernay - and better hands and more physical at the catch-point than both tooRight now neither Boykin nor Duv are going to be seeing much playtime as a WR, barring a jump in skill from either one, as Duv cannot beat any coverage whatsoever and Boykin's route running is awful. However, they actually do bring value in something unlike proche.
That seems a tad excessive. Hopefully they can trade some of them for current NFL talent to take a flier on.
I see. I still don't get how our FO thinks getting a player to switch position (in day 2) is a better idea than getting someone who's always played single deep and even do so within a reasonable time.
This Christmas just doesn't feel like every other year's
I see. I still don't get how our FO thinks getting a player to switch position (in day 2) is a better idea than getting someone who's always played single deep and even do so within a reasonable time.
This Christmas just doesn't feel like every other year's
a few years ago, maybe 2017 give or take a year or two. That was a very bad class in terms of depth. Think it was worst that year than it was this year.
I agree here, I don’t get the hate on this class, I’ve seen a lot of really good looking prospects fallingI honestly do not think this draft class is as bad as advertised, but we had a lot less of a look at players than expected. There are probably going to be more UDFA and lower round picks who succeed this year versus previous years due to the sheer lack of knowledge on players.
I honestly do not think this draft class is as bad as advertised, but we had a lot less of a look at players than expected. There are probably going to be more UDFA and lower round picks who succeed this year versus previous years due to the sheer lack of knowledge on players.
Lamar and Boykin just don’t click. Their personalities probably don’t match. Funny lamar didnt tag him in
In regards to this draft class, reporters have said they've heard from multiple teams who have said it's one of the weakest they've ever seen. Teams feel like they'll be picking typical UDFAs starting toward the end of the 5th. UDFAs will be guys lucky to get a tryout in normal years. It's a weak class in terms of depth without question. Doesn't mean there won't still be quality players though.
Lamar and Boykin just don’t click. Their personalities probably don’t match. Funny lamar didnt tag him in